Support amendment: abolish corporate personhood, money as speech
Impact
The resolution highlights a critical issue within the legal interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, particularly referencing the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision of 2010. This decision allowed for unlimited corporate spending in electoral politics, leading to an imbalance in representation. By advocating for a constitutional amendment, supporters of SR93 hope to reestablish a system where individuals, rather than corporations, have a predominant role in elections and political discourse, thereby reclaiming the essence of democracy and self-governance.
Summary
Senate Resolution 93 (SR93) calls on state and federal legislators to support an amendment to the United States Constitution that aims to abolish corporate personhood and the doctrine of money as speech. This resolution is rooted in the belief that corporations, as legal entities created by the government, do not possess unalienable rights comparable to those of human beings. By asserting that corporate influence in politics undermines fair representation and equality in democratic elections, SR93 addresses significant concerns regarding the power dynamics between corporations and individuals.
Sentiment
Public sentiment surrounding SR93 is predominantly supportive among activists, grassroots organizations, and certain legislative members who argue that corporate personhood distorts democracy. They assert that the resolution is essential for empowering citizens and reinforcing democratic values. However, the sentiment is also contentious, as opponents may argue that limitations on corporate speech could infringe on free speech rights or argue in favor of maintaining the current system that allows for corporate influence in politics.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding SR93 arise from debates about the implications of amending the Constitution to restrict corporate rights. Proponents express concerns about the extent to which corporate entities can influence public policy, elections, and governance, while opponents may view such amendments as a threat to business interests and economic freedom. The push to abolish corporate personhood raises fundamental questions about the balance of power in democracy and the role of money in politics.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.