Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB2214

Introduced
2/1/21  
Refer
2/2/21  
Report Pass
3/1/21  
Engrossed
3/11/21  
Refer
3/17/21  
Report Pass
4/5/21  
Refer
4/5/21  
Report Pass
4/7/21  
Enrolled
5/25/21  

Caption

Game and fish; predator control devices; limitation on devices to certain time of year; effective date.

Impact

The implementation of HB 2214 is expected to align with wildlife management objectives by establishing specific timelines for when predator control devices can be used. This aims to limit potential environmental hazards associated with the use of toxic substances during periods when non-target species might be at risk. By regulating the use of cyanide devices, the bill seeks to promote a safer coexistence of wildlife and human activities while providing the necessary oversight through a permitting process established by game wardens.

Summary

House Bill 2214 is a legislative measure aimed at regulating the use of predator control devices in the state of Oklahoma. The bill specifically amends Section 5-301 of the state's wildlife laws, establishing restrictions on the use of certain devices, particularly those utilizing cyanide gas for trapping. It stipulates that these devices cannot be set from April 1 to September 30, while allowing exceptions for licensed commercial hunting areas. Notably, the bill emphasizes the need for proper signage to alert individuals and neighbors about the presence of such devices.

Sentiment

The sentiments surrounding HB 2214 appear to be largely supportive, particularly among legislators concerned with wildlife management and public safety. The unanimous passage in the House, with 82 votes in favor and none against, indicates a strong bipartisan consensus on the importance of regulating predator control methods. However, the nuances of the debate could include concerns related to the effectiveness of such regulations in actually mitigating risks posed by these devices in practice.

Contention

Despite the general support for the bill, there could be ongoing discussions regarding the balance between effective wildlife control and the risks associated with chemical traps. Some stakeholders may express worries about potential negative impacts on non-target wildlife populations, while proponents might argue that the bill's regulatory framework is a necessary measure to ensure responsible hunting practices. This reflects a broader contention within wildlife policy debates about the ethics and safety of using deadly traps in public and private lands.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.