Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB2352

Introduced
2/1/21  
Refer
2/2/21  
Refer
2/22/21  
Report Pass
2/24/21  
Engrossed
3/4/21  
Refer
3/15/21  
Report Pass
3/23/21  
Enrolled
4/21/21  

Caption

Care and custody of children; agreements with Indian tribes for care and custody of Indian children and contents of petition; ratifying certain agreements; retroactive application of certain provisions; emergency.

Impact

The enactment of HB 2352 will have significant implications for state laws concerning child custody and adoption. It formally authorizes state agencies, such as the Department of Human Services and the Office of Juvenile Affairs, to enter into agreements with Indian tribes. These agreements will provide a framework for jointly managing child custody cases, which is crucial for respecting the cultural and legal interests of Indian tribes while ensuring the welfare of children involved in such proceedings.

Summary

House Bill 2352 addresses the care and custody of children, specifically focusing on agreements between the State of Oklahoma and Indian tribes relating to the custody of Indian children. This bill amends existing statutes to facilitate the creation of agreements that allow for concurrent jurisdiction over child custody cases, as permitted by the Federal Indian Child Welfare Act. By doing so, it aims to clarify legal processes in child custody cases involving Indian children, enhancing cooperation between state authorities and tribal jurisdictions.

Sentiment

The general sentiment among legislators around HB 2352 appears to be supportive, as evidenced by its unanimous passage in both the House and Senate. The bill is seen as a positive step towards better integration of state and tribal legal systems, addressing a gap in the law that previously complicated the care and custody of Indian children. Stakeholders, including tribal leaders, have expressed approval for the bill, as it enhances their authority in related legal matters.

Contention

Despite its broad support, there are potential points of contention that may arise from HB 2352, particularly concerning the precise scope of jurisdiction and the execution of agreements. Critics may argue about the risks of state overreach into tribal sovereignty or raise concerns about the particulars of how these joint custody agreements will be implemented in practice. Ensuring effective communication and agreement between state and tribal entities will be critical to the successful execution of the provisions set forth in this bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

OK SB1047

Defamation; creating the Truth in Reporting Act. Emergency.

OK SB1047

Defamation; creating the Truth in Reporting Act. Emergency.

OK SB623

Protection from Domestic Abuse Act; requiring service in certain location; requiring initial attempt of service of protective orders upon defendant within specified time frame. Emergency.

OK SB1241

Insurance; modifying definitions; conforming language; requiring notice by receiving insurer. Emergency.

OK HB1622

Victim protective orders; making certain acts unlawful; effective date.

OK HB3588

Protective orders; service; service by publication; conditions; court approval; time; information; form; hearing; effective date.

OK HB2771

Domestic violence; prohibiting persons convicted of certain offenses or subject to protective orders from possessing firearms; codification; effective date.

OK HB2771

Domestic violence; prohibiting persons convicted of certain offenses or subject to protective orders from possessing firearms; codification; effective date.