Oklahoma Senate Bill SB619

Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/21
• Refer: 2/2/21
• Report Pass: 2/2/21
• Report Pass: 2/24/21
• Engrossed: 3/8/21
• Refer: 3/22/21
• Report Pass: 3/31/21
• Enrolled: 5/3/21
• Passed: 5/5/21

Caption

Schools; allowing certain students to participate in apprenticeships, internships and mentorships. Effective date. Emergency.

Impact

The bill expands the scope of the Apprenticeships, Internships and Mentorships (AIM) Act of 2016, by allowing students to count these experiences towards elective course requirements. Importantly, schools are enabled to obtain liability insurance to cover students participating in these programs, although they are prohibited from charging students or their guardians for this coverage. This provision aims to mitigate concerns over liability risks and encourage schools to create these opportunities without imposing financial burdens on families.

Summary

SB619 is a legislative bill aimed at enhancing career readiness for high school students in Oklahoma through the establishment of apprenticeships, internships, and mentorships. The bill authorizes public, private, magnet, charter, and virtual charter schools to create partnerships with public or private organizations for the purpose of facilitating these programs. By opening pathways for students aged sixteen and older to engage in work experiences, the bill recognizes the value of hands-on training in preparing students for future careers.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB619 appears to be positive among its supporters, particularly among educators and those involved in workforce development. Proponents believe that by promoting career-oriented programs, the bill supports students in gaining valuable skills that are essential in the job market. However, there could be concerns raised by stakeholders about the implementation aspects, particularly regarding how schools would effectively manage these partnerships and insurance provisions.

Contention

While the bill passed without opposition in the House, discussions may reveal potential tensions regarding the implementation of liability insurance and the responsibility of schools to partner with organizations. Critics may argue that the bill does not do enough to ensure the quality and safety of mentorship opportunities, or that it could inadvertently lead to inequities where some schools may lack the resources to effectively manage such programs.