Joint resolution; referring question of calling a Constitutional Convention to a vote of the people. Ballot title.
If SJR12 passes, it would have significant implications on the future of the Oklahoma Constitution. It would allow for possible substantial changes that could impact various aspects of state law, freeing the legislative body to propose revisions that might have been difficult to pass through the traditional legislative process. Supporters believe this could lead to necessary updates to the Constitution, reflecting contemporary values and issues, while critics caution that such a convention could result in further amendments that may undermine existing rights and regulations.
SJR12 proposes to put to a vote the question of calling a Constitutional Convention in Oklahoma. This resolution aims to empower the people to decide whether to generate proposals for alterations, revisions, or amendments to the existing Oklahoma Constitution, or to consider establishing a completely new constitution. The resolution outlines that should the proposal be approved, it would direct the Secretary of State to oversee the process of the referendum, thus allowing citizens a direct say in constitutional matters affecting the state.
Debate surrounding SJR12 focuses on how calling for a Constitutional Convention could change the balance of power in state governance. Proponents argue that it is essential for modernizing the Constitution to better serve the current needs of Oklahomans. Opponents, however, express concerns about the potential for unintended consequences, such as removing long-standing protections found within the current Constitution. The conversations surrounding this bill highlight the challenges in aligning the intent of constitutional reform with the preservation of essential rights and principles.