Schools; making an appropriation to the State Board of Education; establishing minimum salary schedule; providing certain stipends; modifying the Stat Aid fundin formula; effective date; emergency.
Impact
In terms of impact, HB 2672 modifies existing state law regarding public school funding and literacy programs. It amends sections of the Reading Sufficiency Act to implement a more rigorous structure for accountability and student support, mandating that certain funds directly benefit students struggling with reading. The bill also establishes minimum salary schedules for certified personnel, ensuring that educators receive appropriate compensation, which is expected to contribute positively to workforce retention and morale within schools.
Summary
House Bill 2672, also known as the Education Appropriations and Literacy Bill, aims to provide substantial financial support to Oklahoma public schools while simultaneously establishing a structured framework for literacy instruction, especially for students with dyslexia. This bill appropriates $500 million to the State Board of Education for the financial support of public schools, emphasizing the provision of funds for kindergarten through third grade. The aim is to improve educational outcomes by directing funds specifically towards literacy programs and the employment of instructional teams specialized in reading deficiencies.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 2672 appears to be largely positive among educational advocates and teaching professionals. Proponents argue that the bill addresses critical issues in early literacy education and commend its focus on dyslexia interventions as a critical need for many students. However, some concerns were noted regarding the feasibility of implementing such a wide-ranging funding program and the logistics of deploying literacy instructional teams effectively across diverse districts.
Contention
Notable points of contention revolve around the bill's funding allocations and the effectiveness of the proposed measures. Critics question whether the $500 million funding will be sufficient to meet the ambitious goals set forth in the bill and express doubts about the state’s ability to implement the literacy teams in various districts consistently. Additionally, stakeholders are concerned that without ongoing assessment and adaptation of these measures, the intended outcomes may not be realized, particularly for students with varying levels of literacy challenges.
Schools; making an appropriation to the State Board of Education; establishing minimum salary schedule; modifying State Aid weights; effective date; emergency.
Schools; making an appropriation to the State Board of Education; establishing minimum salary schedule; modifying State Aid weights; effective date; emergency.
Schools; modifying goals of certain programs; modifying eligibility for certain higher education programs; adding references to Classic Learning Test; effective date; emergency.
Reading Sufficiency Act; renaming act the Strong Readers Act; removing language prohibiting automatic promotion of certain students. Effective date. Emergency.
Schools; making an appropriation to the State Board of Education; establishing minimum salary schedule; modifying State Aid weights; effective date; emergency.
Schools; making an appropriation to the State Board of Education; establishing minimum salary schedule; modifying State Aid weights; effective date; emergency.
Strong Readers Act; modifying use of Statewide Literacy Revolving Fund; modifying requirement for teacher preparation program students to complete certain training. Effective date. Emergency.
Mathematics instruction; directing expenditure of certain funds; creating the Oklahoma Math Achievement and Proficiency Act. Effective date. Emergency.