Oklahoma House Bill HB2157

Oklahoma 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/7/23
• Refer: 2/8/23
• Report Pass: 3/2/23
• Engrossed: 3/9/23
• Refer: 3/29/23

Caption

Mental health; Local Law Enforcement Mental Health Manpower Act; written statement; creating the Shannon Hanchett Act; mental health evaluation; effective date.

Impact

The bill amends the Local Law Enforcement Mental Health Manpower Act and introduces significant changes to the procedures surrounding mental health evaluations and the conditions under which individuals can be taken into custody. Officers are now authorized to detain individuals without immediate emergency mental health treatment if their assessment indicates that such treatment is not necessary. This provision aims to streamline the process of managing individuals in crisis and prevent unnecessary hospitalization, which could lead to a more efficient use of resources within the local law enforcement system.

Summary

House Bill 2157, known as the Shannon Hanchett Act, is legislation aimed at improving mental health intervention procedures within the Oklahoma law enforcement agencies. The bill proposes that at least 20% of active-duty peace officers complete crisis intervention training to better handle situations involving individuals who may be mentally ill, alcohol-dependent, or drug-dependent. This training is intended to augment existing mental health training requirements, thereby equipping officers with the skills needed to manage crisis situations more effectively and compassionately.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 2157 appears to be supportive among legislators, as reflected in the unanimous vote (92-0) during the third reading in the House. Supporters argue that this bill is a crucial step in enhancing the capacity of law enforcement to respond to mental health crises, thereby potentially reducing the stigma and logistical challenges associated with mental health treatment. However, there may be underlying concerns from mental health professionals about the implications of allowing law enforcement to evaluate mental health conditions, and their capability to do so without comprehensive training.

Contention

One notable point of contention that might arise from the enactment of HB 2157 is the potential for misinterpretation of an individual's mental health status by law enforcement officers, whose primary training is not in mental health assessment. This could lead to issues where individuals are taken into custody without sufficient evaluation, raising ethical questions about the balance between law enforcement responsibilities and mental health care. Critics may argue that enhanced training is necessary to ensure that officers are not only equipped to intervene but also understand the complexities of mental health needs and the best practices in crisis situations.