Oklahoma 2024 Regular Session

Oklahoma Senate Bill SB1383

Introduced
2/5/24  
Refer
2/6/24  
Report Pass
2/8/24  
Refer
2/8/24  
Report Pass
2/14/24  
Engrossed
3/6/24  

Caption

Diagnostic x-ray systems; requiring the Board of Dentistry to enforce certain laws. Effective date.

Impact

The passage of SB 1383 is expected to enhance regulatory oversight and alignment between state and federal standards concerning diagnostic x-ray use. By allowing the Board of Dentistry to oversee this aspect of practice, the bill aims to ensure compliance with health safety protocols, ultimately enhancing patient safety. The legislation may also streamline processes within dental offices by providing clearer guidelines on x-ray usage and compliance issues. This change could lead to increased accountability among practitioners who utilize x-ray systems in their practice.

Summary

Senate Bill 1383, introduced by Senator Bergstrom and Representative West, amends existing laws related to diagnostic x-ray systems and the powers and duties of the Board of Dentistry in Oklahoma. The bill mandates that the Board of Dentistry enforce both state and federal laws governing the use of diagnostic x-ray systems specifically in dental offices. This marks a significant shift in regulatory responsibilities, assigning the oversight of x-ray systems used in dental practices to the Board, while the State Department of Health retains its role in overseeing broader health and safety measures related to these systems.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1383 is generally positive among dental professionals, who view the bill as a needed update to regulations that govern technical practices in dentistry. Supporters argue that empowering the Board of Dentistry with additional responsibilities will promote better health outcomes through stricter enforcement of laws governing x-ray usage. However, some skepticism exists regarding the potential for increased bureaucracy and the enforcement of additional fees associated with inspections and licensing.

Contention

A notable point of contention arises from concerns about the potential burden the bill may impose on dental offices regarding compliance costs and administrative overhead. While many support the move toward a more regulated environment for health and safety, critics express fears that the added responsibilities may lead to increased operating costs for smaller practices. Furthermore, there is an ongoing debate about how much regulatory oversight is necessary to ensure patient safety without stifling dental practice operations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB257

Health care coverage: diagnostic imaging.

CA SB974

Health care coverage: diagnostic imaging.

IL HB5115

IDPH-DIAGNOSTIC ALGORITHM

IL HB1002

IDPH-DIAGNOSTIC ALGORITHM

CA AB2024

Health care coverage: diagnostic imaging.

TX HB1809

Relating to the registration of diagnostic imaging equipment, the accreditation of diagnostic imaging facilities, and the regulation of diagnostic imaging providers; providing penalties.

CA SB639

Medical professionals: course requirements.

TX SB1461

Relating to the registration of diagnostic imaging equipment, the accreditation of diagnostic imaging facilities, and the regulation of diagnostic imaging providers; providing penalties.