Oklahoma 2025 Regular Session

Oklahoma Senate Bill SB147

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
2/25/25  
Engrossed
3/18/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Report Pass
4/17/25  
Enrolled
5/15/25  

Caption

Administration of elections; requiring Secretary of the State Election Board to direct all counties to conduct post-election audits for specified elections. Effective date.

Impact

This bill is expected to have a significant impact on the voting process in Oklahoma, as it formalizes the requirement for post-election audits. Such audits are designed not only to verify election outcomes but also to reinforce the confidence of the electorate in the electoral system. By fulfilling these audits, counties can identify discrepancies in vote counts and improve upon the security measures in place for future elections.

Summary

Senate Bill 147 pertains to the administration of elections in Oklahoma, specifically mandating the Secretary of the State Election Board to direct all counties to conduct post-election audits for specified elections. This initiative is aimed at enhancing the integrity of the electoral process by ensuring that voting devices and software are accurately tabulating votes. The bill outlines protocols regarding the methods, timing, and procedures of the audits to provide a consistent approach across counties.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 147 appears to be supportive among lawmakers, with a unanimous voting outcome in favor of the bill during its passage in both the Senate and the House. The legislative discussions hint at a recognition of the need for enhanced electoral security and transparency, reflecting a proactive approach to safeguarding the election process. However, there may be underlying concerns among certain groups about the practical implementation of these audits and the potential burden on county resources.

Contention

While the bill enjoys broad support, there are points of contention regarding how audits will be managed and the extent of their thoroughness. Critics may voice concerns regarding the costs associated with conducting regular audits and how these could impact local election funding. Additionally, questions about maintaining the privacy and confidentiality of ballot information during audits could arise, indicating a need for careful balancing of transparency and voter protection.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB493

District agricultural associations: secretary-managers: compensation.

MO HB2798

Modifies the "Missouri Family Trust Company Act"

LA HB528

Reforms the organizational structure for the Department of Transportation and Development including its duties, powers, and responsibilities of officers and employees (EN INCREASE SD EX See Note)

CA AB1044

Elections: Secretary of State.

AR SB63

To Amend Arkansas Law Concerning Reports By The Secretaries Of Cabinet-level Departments On The State Of Their Departments.

CA AB1206

Voter registration database: Electronic Registration Information Center.

CA SB297

Elections: initiatives and referenda: withdrawal.

CA AB1004

Secretary of State: voter information Internet Web site.