Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB2978

Introduced
1/13/25  
Refer
1/17/25  
Report Pass
3/11/25  
Report Pass
3/27/25  
Engrossed
4/1/25  

Caption

Relating to natural resources.

Impact

The implementation of HB 2978 is expected to enhance the safety of both wildlife and road users by reducing the frequency of wildlife-vehicle collisions. The bill emphasizes the importance of infrastructure modifications, such as wildlife crossing structures and roadway fencing, to facilitate the safe passage of wildlife. Furthermore, the bill outlines requirements for regular reporting by the ODOT concerning the program's progress and efficacy, which will foster transparency and accountability in the management of wildlife crossing initiatives.

Summary

House Bill 2978 aims to address the issue of wildlife-vehicle collisions in Oregon by establishing a comprehensive program under the Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the State Department of Fish and Wildlife. The bill mandates the creation of an advisory group to collaborate on reducing these collisions and improving wildlife corridor connectivity. This group will include a diverse set of stakeholders, including government representatives, academic experts, and members of nonprofit organizations, to ensure that a wide range of perspectives is considered in the planning and execution of the program.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 2978 appears to be supportive among environmental advocates and wildlife management professionals, who see it as a proactive measure to address a significant issue affecting both animal populations and human safety. However, there may also be concerns regarding the costs associated with implementing the proposed infrastructure changes and whether sufficient funding can be secured to sustain the program over time.

Contention

While there is a general backing for the bill's objectives, notable points of contention might arise regarding the allocation of state resources and funding for the infrastructure projects outlined in the program. Critics may argue about the viability of financing the proposed wildlife crossings and the potential impacts on public budgets. Additionally, there may be discussions on how effectively the advisory group can incorporate public input and address local community concerns while aiming for wildlife conservation and road safety improvements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ SB1184

Transportation services employees; drivers; wages

UT SB0310

Transportation Utility Fee Amendments

TX HB2440

Relating to transportation network companies; imposing and authorizing fees; requiring an occupational permit; authorizing a civil penalty.

CA AB1343

Local alternative transportation improvement program: Feather River crossing.

TX HB1576

Relating to the delivery of certain transportation services under Medicaid and certain other health and human services programs.

NJ A3904

Requires geotechnical testing and certain monitoring of transportation projects.

NJ S2954

Requires geotechnical testing and certain monitoring of transportation projects.

TX SB1667

Relating to the delivery of certain transportation services under Medicaid and certain other health and human services programs.