In general provisions relating to operation of vehicles, providing for certain limitations in cities of the first class.
Impact
The enactment of SB327 is expected to affect the operational practices of first-class cities where automated red light cameras are in use. By imposing a ten-year limit on initiating civil actions for citations issued through these systems, the bill seeks to streamline enforcement processes, ensuring that residents have a defined timeframe for the collection of fines and penalties. This change could result in fewer prolonged disputes over older violations as the timeframe for legal recourse would be clearly established, potentially leading to more efficient municipal revenue collection from traffic enforcement.
Summary
Senate Bill 327, introduced in January 2023, seeks to amend Title 75 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes by establishing specific limitations on civil actions related to violations issued through automated red light enforcement systems within first-class cities. This legislation mandates that any civil proceedings to collect fines, penalties, or fees associated with such violations must be pursued within ten years of the violation notice's issuance. This provision aims to provide clarity and limitations for municipalities in enforcing traffic regulations through automated systems, thereby impacting the way violations are processed and contested in court.
Sentiment
General sentiment regarding SB327 appears to be supportive among proponents who appreciate the clarity and definitive timelines set for civil actions related to automated enforcement. Supporters argue that the bill protects citizens from indefinite citation collections and provides a fair process when dealing with traffic violations. However, there may be concerns from critics who advocate for stronger regulatory oversight of automated enforcement practices, fearing this legislation could inadvertently diminish the effectiveness of traffic safety measures associated with such systems.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding SB327 include discussions about the balance between state law and local governance in traffic enforcement practices. Critics may contend that limiting the timeframe for action could undermine local authorities' efficiency in managing traffic violations and protecting public safety. Additionally, there may be debates regarding the effectiveness of automated traffic enforcement systems and the fairness of penalties imposed on drivers, especially in how these systems are deployed and managed at the local level.
In registration of vehicles, further providing for suspension of registration upon sixth unpaid parking violation in cities of the first class; and making editorial changes.
In general provisions relating to operation of vehicles, further providing for automated red light enforcement systems in first class cities and for automated red light enforcement systems in certain municipalities; and, in rules of the road in general, further providing for enforcement of failure to stop for school bus with flashing red lights, for automated speed enforcement systems in active work zones and for pilot program for automated speed enforcement system on designated highway.
In taxicabs and limousines in first class cities, further providing for certificate and medallion required; and, in regulation of taxicabs and limousines in cities of the first class, further providing for regulation of taxicabs and limousines.
In general provisions relating to operation of vehicles, further providing for obedience to authorized persons directing traffic and providing for drivers in organized motorcycle processions; and, in rules of the road in general, further providing for following too closely.
In general provisions relating to operation of vehicles, further providing for obedience to authorized persons directing traffic and providing for drivers in organized motorcycle processions; and, in rules of the road in general, further providing for following too closely.