Rhode Island 2023 Regular Session

Rhode Island House Bill H6058

Introduced
3/3/23  
Refer
3/3/23  
Report Pass
5/16/23  
Engrossed
5/25/23  
Engrossed
6/15/23  

Caption

Zoning Ordinances

Impact

The legislation aims to create a more consistent and expansive framework for affordable housing across Rhode Island's municipalities. By establishing clear requirements for inclusionary zoning, the bill seeks to mitigate the housing crisis and ensure more equitable housing options for residents. Municipalities will be incentivized to provide additional density bonuses and zoning incentives to developers who integrate affordable housing units, thereby promoting more inclusive growth in community development.

Summary

House Bill H6058 focuses on revising zoning ordinances to enhance the inclusion of affordable housing within new developments in Rhode Island. The bill mandates that zoning regulations require a minimum of 25% of total units in developments to be classified as affordable housing, remaining affordable for at least 30 years. It allows municipalities to implement various methods for including affordable housing, including off-site construction or financial contributions in lieu of building. The intent is to streamline the integration of affordable units into the housing market to address housing affordability issues in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding H6058 appears largely positive among advocates of affordable housing, as it is viewed as a progressive step towards improving housing availability for low- and moderate-income families. However, there may be concerns among some developers regarding the implications of these requirements on project feasibility and profitability. Shared perspectives highlight the necessity of balancing housing demands with the interests of developers to ensure that the law is effective without discouraging private investment in new residential projects.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the specifics of the density bonuses and the thresholds for affordability requirements. While proponents argue that the bill enhances the potential for affordable housing development, critics may feel that the mandatory percentage for affordable units is too high and could deter investments in new developments. There are also discussions on how municipalities will manage and allocate funds collected through in-lieu fees, including transparency measures for effective utilization, which could impact the overall effectiveness of the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.