Rhode Island House Bill H6089

Rhode Island 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/23
• Refer: 3/3/23
• Report Pass: 3/28/23
• Passed: 4/6/23

Caption

House Resolution Extending The Reporting And Expiration Dates, And Requiring Reappointment Of The Membership Of The Legislative Commission To Study The Entire Area Of Land Use, Preservation, Development, Housing, Environment, And Regulation (extends The Reporting And Expiration Dates And Requires A Letter Of Continued Interest To The Speaker For Reappointment Of Membership, To The Commission To Study The Entire Area Of Land Use From 6/8/23 To 6/8/25 And Would Expire On 6/30/25.)

Impact

The extension granted by H6089 pushes the reporting deadline for the commission to June 8, 2025, and sets its expiration date to June 30, 2025. This additional time is essential for ensuring thorough studies and discussions can take place regarding land use and environmental regulations, highlighting the state's commitment to addressing these pressing issues effectively. The requirement for members to submit a letter of interest for reappointment also emphasizes the need for continued engagement and expertise in these areas.

Summary

House Bill 6089 is a resolution aimed at extending the operational timeframe and reappointment requirements for the Legislative Commission tasked with studying significant areas concerning land use, preservation, development, housing, environment, and regulation in Rhode Island. Originally formed through a resolution passed in 2021, this commission plays a crucial role in examining and making recommendations on various matters that intersect with state land management and housing policies. The resolution intends to allow the commission ample time to delve into these important topics, advocating for a continuation of their work until mid-2025.

Contention

While the bill is generally procedural, possible contention could arise around the single area of reappointment, as it necessitates that commission members express continued interest through a formal process. This may influence who comprises the commission moving forward and how effectively diverse viewpoints are represented in ongoing discussions related to land use and its regulation. However, specific details on any notable contention concerning the bill were not documented in the discussions and voting records.