Requires DOA provide inventory of all state agencies using artificial intelligence (AI); establishes a permanent commission to monitor the use of AI in state government and makes recommendations for state government policy and other decisions.
Effective February 1, 2025, H7158 requires that no state agency implement AI systems without first conducting an impact assessment. This assessment aims to ensure that the AI systems introduced do not lead to unlawful discrimination based on characteristics such as race, gender, or disability. In addition, the bill creates a permanent Rhode Island Artificial Intelligence Commission, tasked with ongoing evaluation and recommendations regarding state AI practices. This commission will also monitor compliance with the new regulations and report annually to the governor and legislature on the findings and necessary improvements.
House Bill H7158, titled the Artificial Intelligence Accountability Act, establishes comprehensive regulations governing the use of artificial intelligence (AI) by state agencies in Rhode Island. The bill mandates the Department of Administration to compile an annual inventory detailing all AI systems in use across state agencies, including their purposes and vendors. Furthermore, it sets forth definitions of AI, emphasizing systems capable of learning and evolving independently. Such clarity in terminology is crucial for administrators and developers who work with emerging technologies.
Overall, the passage of H7158 reflects a growing recognition of both the promise and pitfalls of AI in governmental functions, advocating for both responsible development and protection against biases inherent in these systems. As AI continues to evolve, the stipulations of this bill aim to balance technological advancement with ethical considerations and societal equity.
While supporters of H7158 laud it as a necessary move towards accountability in the rapidly-growing field of artificial intelligence, critics point out potential overreach and the complexities involved in regulations that could stifle innovation. Concerns have been raised regarding the bureaucratic hurdles state agencies might face in adopting new technologies, particularly if these technologies require extensive investigations and compliance measures before implementation. Furthermore, ensuring adequate training for agency staff to adhere to the new regulatory framework presents an additional challenge.