Tennessee House Bill HB1408

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/14/25
• Refer: 2/24/25
• Refer: 4/15/25
• Engrossed: 4/16/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 3; Title 4; Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 8; Title 9; Title 10; Title 11; Title 12; Title 13; Title 16; Title 17; Title 18; Title 29; Title 33; Title 36; Title 37; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 41; Title 43; Title 44; Title 45; Title 47; Title 48; Title 49; Title 50; Title 53; Title 54; Title 55; Title 56; Title 57; Title 58; Title 59; Title 60; Title 61; Title 62; Title 63; Title 64; Title 65; Title 66; Title 67; Title 68; Title 69; Title 70 and Title 71, relative to statutory revisions required for implementation of the annual appropriations act.

Impact

As it stands, the bill intends to update and refine the legal framework guiding Tennessee's budgeting and funding processes. By amending sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated from Titles 3 through 71, the legislation seeks to address any inconsistencies or outdated language that may hinder the efficient implementation of appropriations. This effort reflects a commitment to maintaining an agile legal structure that can adapt to the fiscal needs of the state.

Summary

House Bill 1408 introduced by Lamberth is a legislative measure aimed at amending various titles within the Tennessee Code Annotated. The primary focus of the bill is to implement statutory revisions that are necessary for the effective execution of the annual appropriations act. These amendments encompass a wide range of titles, highlighting the bill's broad scope and potential implications for state law administration.

Contention

While the bill's objective is to streamline the statutory framework for fiscal management, there may be points of contention surrounding the extent of the proposed changes. Critics could argue that such sweeping revisions might obfuscate existing legal provisions or create gaps in governance if not carefully considered. Furthermore, the lack of detailed discussions or disclosures in the provided documents leaves room for speculation about specific amendments and their operational impacts.