Tennessee Senate Bill SB1429

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/14/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 3; Title 4; Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 8; Title 9; Title 10; Title 11; Title 12; Title 13; Title 16; Title 17; Title 18; Title 29; Title 33; Title 36; Title 37; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 41; Title 43; Title 44; Title 45; Title 47; Title 48; Title 49; Title 50; Title 53; Title 54; Title 55; Title 56; Title 57; Title 58; Title 59; Title 60; Title 61; Title 62; Title 63; Title 64; Title 65; Title 66; Title 67; Title 68; Title 69; Title 70 and Title 71, relative to statutory revisions required for implementation of the annual appropriations act.

Impact

The modifications introduced by SB1429 are expected to streamline the operational framework concerning state appropriations and budgetary oversight. By accommodating both monthly and quarterly reporting frequencies, the bill seeks to reduce the administrative burden on state agencies and potentially increase efficiency in governmental processes. This flexibility may benefit agencies that manage resources and stakeholder reporting, offering them the ability to align their reporting schedules with operational needs more effectively.

Summary

Senate Bill 1429 aims to make several statutory revisions necessary for the implementation of the annual appropriations act in Tennessee. This bill amends various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated, affecting numerous titles that govern state regulations. Among the notable changes proposed are alterations in reporting frequencies related to certain statutes, particularly changing the language from 'monthly' to 'monthly or quarterly'. This indicates a shift towards more flexible reporting requirements, which could impact administrative processes within the state's various departments responsible for reporting and compliance.

Contention

While the text does not highlight any overt points of contention, any changes to statutory requirements can often lead to discussions surrounding accountability and transparency. Stakeholders might debate whether such a shift towards less frequent reporting could adversely affect oversight or fiscal accountability within state operations. As such, if enacted, SB1429 may open up future discussions around the implications of flexible reporting on fiscal management and legislative oversight within Tennessee's budgetary framework.