Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB1043

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
4/7/09  
Voted on by House
4/21/09  
Out of Senate Committee
5/21/09  
Voted on by Senate
5/27/09  
Governor Action
6/19/09  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Enrolled
5/31/09  

Caption

Relating to the creation of business opportunities for certain former foster children.

Impact

The introduction of this bill would significantly impact state employment policies pertaining to hiring practices at state agencies. If enacted, it would amend existing government code to establish a clear framework for the employment preference, creating new opportunities within the state's workforce for vulnerable populations. The bill also provides assurances for job retention during workforce reductions, ensuring that former foster children are given preference over their peers if layoffs occur within similar job classifications. This provision highlights the intention to create stability for individuals who often face numerous challenges in securing steady employment.

Summary

House Bill 1043 is proposed legislation aimed at enhancing employment opportunities for former foster children by establishing an employment preference at state agencies. This bill seeks to introduce a preferential hiring mechanism whereby individuals who were under the permanent managing conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services would be prioritized in hiring processes for state jobs. Specifically, these individuals would receive a 10-point service credit in competitive examinations, provided they meet the minimum score criteria. This preferential treatment aims to improve the employment prospects of former foster youth as they transition into adulthood.

Contention

While the bill aims to support former foster children, it may face discussions regarding the balance between preferential hiring and merit-based employment systems. Proponents could argue that this preference addresses historical inequities and barriers faced by former foster youth. Conversely, concerns might arise that such preferences could be viewed as compromising standard merit-based hiring practices, raising questions about qualifications and fairness in employment processes among applicants. Furthermore, there could be discussions about the potential financial implications of implementing such preferential hiring policies within state agencies, especially regarding budgeting and operational adjustments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.