Texas House Bill HB3391

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/20/09
• Voted on by House: 5/4/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/15/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/21/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/26/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the continuation and functions of the Parks and Wildlife Department; changing the elements of an offense.

Impact

The bill aims to enhance the efficiency of the Parks and Wildlife Department by implementing updated complaint resolution protocols and expanding its regulatory authority over exotic species, including plants and aquatic life. By introducing technology-driven solutions, the department seeks to improve its public interaction mechanisms and overall operational capacity. The proposed amendments also provide clear guidelines for the management of exotic species, which could significantly affect environmental conservation efforts and local biodiversity protection.

Summary

House Bill 3391 focuses on the continuation and functions of the Parks and Wildlife Department, emphasizing improvements in the department's operations and regulatory frameworks. The bill proposes amendments to existing laws concerning the management of exotic aquatic plants and the establishment of an internal affairs office to oversee investigations into misconduct within the department. Additionally, it incorporates negotiated rulemaking and alternative dispute resolution procedures to enhance governmental transparency and efficiency in addressing public issues.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB3391 may arise from concerns regarding the regulation of exotic species, particularly in regard to environmental impacts. Stakeholders could express apprehension about the potential negative consequences of allowing more permissive regulations on the importation and management of aquatic plants, which may pose ecological risks. Furthermore, the establishment of an internal affairs office may raise discussions on oversight and accountability within the department, leading to debates about the adequacy of checks and balances in regulating department conduct.