Texas House Bill HJR62

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/17/09

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment to provide that the Railroad Commission of Texas is governed by a single elected railroad commissioner.

Impact

The impact of HJR62 on Texas law would be substantial, as it seeks to abolish the three-member governance structure that has existed historically. With the introduction of a single commissioner, this amendment could lead to more cohesive policies and clearer accountability in the commission's actions. Supporters argue that this reform would improve efficiency and responsiveness in the regulation of the railroad industry, potentially benefiting economic growth and public service delivery in the sector. As a result, the amendment would also influence the political landscape by concentrating power in the hands of one individual rather than a group.

Summary

HJR62 proposes a constitutional amendment to restructure the governance of the Railroad Commission of Texas, replacing the current three-member commission with a single elected railroad commissioner. This change aims to streamline decision-making within the commission, as it would transfer all powers and responsibilities from the abolished three-member body to the newly elected commissioner. This amendment is significant as it advocates for a more centralized leadership model within the commission, affecting how regulatory measures in transportation and oil/gas industry are implemented in Texas.

Contention

Notably, there may be concerns regarding the concentration of power in a single office. Critics could raise issues regarding accountability and potential for abuse of power, as a single individual governing the commission may lead to less oversight. There are implications for public trust, as the election process could significantly determine how transparent and responsive the commission is perceived to be. Additionally, challenges may arise from stakeholders within the railroad and energy sectors regarding the proactive role such a change could prompt, especially if the newly elected commissioner implements policies that may not align with prior regulatory norms.