Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1536 Introduced / Bill

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    2009S0595-1 03/06/09
 By: Uresti S.B. No. 1536


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to preferred drug lists, including confidentiality,
 supplemental rebate, prior authorization, and publication
 requirements.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1. Subsections (a) and (c), Section 531.071,
 Government Code, are amended to read as follows:
 (a) Notwithstanding any other state law, financial
 information obtained or maintained by the commission regarding
 prescription drug rebate negotiations or a supplemental medical
 assistance or other rebate agreement, including trade secrets,
 rebate amount, rebate percentage, and manufacturer or labeler
 pricing, is confidential and not subject to disclosure under
 Chapter 552.
 (c) Notwithstanding Subsection (a), the following
 information is not confidential:
 (1) general [General]information about the aggregate
 costs of different classes of drugs;
 (2)  the fact that a supplemental rebate agreement was
 or was not reached between the commission and a manufacturer or
 labeler for a particular drug; and
 (3)  the fact that a supplemental rebate agreement for
 a particular drug was or was not of a sufficient amount to make the
 drug cost-effective for preferred drug list placement, provided
 that the amount of the rebate or other confidential financial
 information described in this section is not disclosed [is not
 confidential under Subsection (a)].
 SECTION 2. Section 531.072, Government Code, is amended by
 amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsections (b-1), (b-2), and
 (g) to read as follows:
 (b) The preferred drug lists may contain only drugs provided
 by a manufacturer or labeler that reaches an agreement with the
 commission on supplemental rebates under Section 531.070 unless one
 of the following exceptions is met:
 (1)  the commission determines that the drug provided
 by a generic manufacturer or labeler without a supplemental rebate
 is as cost-effective as or more cost-effective than a drug provided
 by a brand name manufacturer or labeler who has reached a
 supplemental rebate agreement with the commission in the same drug
 class; or
 (2)  a program benefit agreement as described in
 Section 531.070 has been reached by the commission and a labeler or
 manufacturer.
 (b-1)  A placement of a drug on the preferred drug list must
 include all strengths and dosages.
 (b-2)  Each drug class must include multiple methods of
 delivery of the drug, including liquid, tablet, capsule, and orally
 disintegrating tablet.
 (g)  Beginning one year after the last review of the drug or
 its drug class, a generic manufacturer or labeler may make an
 application or request to have its drug reconsidered for preferred
 drug placement based upon satisfaction of the cost-effectiveness
 exception described by Subsection (b)(1).
 SECTION 3. Section 531.073, Government Code, is amended by
 adding Subsection (g) to read as follows:
 (g)  The commission shall ensure that prior authorization
 claims submission may occur through multiple telecommunication
 modes, including electronic point-of-sale submission, telephonic
 submission, fax submission, and electronic communications via the
 Internet.
 SECTION 4. Subsections (i) and (m), Section 531.074,
 Government Code, are amended to read as follows:
 (i) The commission shall adopt rules governing the
 operation of the committee, including rules:
 (1) governing the procedures used by the committee for
 providing notice of a meeting; [and]
 (2) [rules] prohibiting the committee from discussing
 confidential financial information described by Section 531.071 in
 a public meeting; and
 (3)  requiring the committee or its delegate to present
 in oral and written form, at the public meeting, a summary of any
 clinical efficacy and safety information or analyses provided to
 the committee by a private entity that has contracted with the
 commission to provide such information.  Confidential financial
 information described in Section 531.071 shall be omitted from the
 summary. The written summary shall be posted to the Internet. [The
 committee shall comply with the rules adopted under this
 subsection.]
 (m) The commission or the commission's agent shall publicly
 disclose, for each specific drug, a recommendation [recommended]
 for or against preferred drug list status, for each drug class
 included in the preferred drug list for the Medicaid vendor drug
 program. The disclosure must be made in writing and posted to the
 Internet after the conclusion of committee deliberations that
 result in recommendations made to the executive commissioner
 regarding the placement of drugs on the preferred drug list. Such
 public disclosure shall include:
 (1)  the general basis for each recommendation for or
 against placement on the preferred drug list, including a statement
 of satisfaction of or failure to meet the criteria listed in
 Subsection (h);
 (2)  for all recommendations of the committee
 supporting placement of a drug on the preferred drug list, a
 statement that a supplemental rebate agreement was reached or, in
 the absence of a supplemental rebate agreement, a statement noting
 which exception described in Section 531.072(b) has been satisfied;
 and
 (3)  for all recommendations of the committee against
 placement of a drug on the preferred drug list, a statement of which
 of the criteria listed in Subsection (h) were not satisfied and, if
 the clinical efficacy or safety criterion was not satisfied, a
 summary of the information relied upon by the committee supporting
 such conclusion.
 SECTION 5. Subchapter B, Chapter 531, Government Code, is
 amended by adding Section 531.0741 to read as follows:
 Sec. 531.0741.  PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO
 COMMISSION DECISION-MAKING.  The commission shall publish on the
 Internet its decisions on preferred drug list placement including:
 (1)  a list of drugs reviewed and the commission's
 decision for or against placement on the preferred drug list for
 each drug;
 (2)  a statement that a supplemental rebate agreement
 was or was not reached between the commission and a manufacturer or
 labeler for a particular drug and, if a supplemental rebate
 agreement was reached, a statement that such agreement was or was
 not of a sufficient amount to make the drug cost-effective for
 preferred drug list placement, without disclosing the amount of the
 rebate or other confidential information described in Section
 531.071; and
 (3)  the rationale for any departure from the
 recommendations of the Pharmaceutical and Therapeutics Committee
 and, if a recommendation was rejected for safety or clinical
 efficacy reasons, information supporting such a decision.
 SECTION 6. This Act takes effect September 1, 2009.