Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB333

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
3/9/09  
Voted on by Senate
3/19/09  
Out of House Committee
5/4/09  
Voted on by House
5/20/09  
Governor Action
6/19/09  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Enrolled
5/31/09  

Caption

Relating to the retention by a county or municipality of certain court costs for maintaining and supporting a certified breath alcohol testing program.

Impact

The bill is expected to provide critical funding for local governments to effectively operate their breath alcohol testing programs, which are vital for public safety measures addressing driving under the influence. By permitting these jurisdictions to retain additional funds from court costs, SB333 seeks to alleviate some of the financial burdens associated with maintaining these programs. This could enhance the capability of local law enforcement to conduct thorough testing and enforce laws related to alcohol consumption and driving.

Summary

SB333 pertains to the management and retention of certain court costs by counties and municipalities for the purpose of maintaining and supporting certified breath alcohol testing programs. Specifically, the legislation allows local governments to retain a portion of court costs collected upon conviction of specific offenses under the Penal Code, except for Class C misdemeanors. The amount retained is set at $22.50 for each applicable court cost. This financial support is aimed at assisting counties and municipalities that do not utilize the services of a certified technical supervisor for their alcohol testing programs.

Conclusion

Ultimately, SB333 represents a legislative effort to bolster local law enforcement's resources to manage breath alcohol testing programs effectively. By adjusting the financial structure surrounding court costs for relevant offenses, the bill strives to enhance safety on Texas roads while addressing possible local funding gaps.

Contention

While the bill aims to support public safety initiatives, potential points of contention might arise regarding the allocation and amount of court costs retained. Critics may question the fairness of imposing additional costs on individuals convicted of offenses, which could disproportionately affect lower-income defendants. Furthermore, there may be concerns about ensuring transparency in how these funds are spent and whether they directly benefit the breath alcohol testing programs as intended.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.