Texas Senate Bill SB636

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/9/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/21/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/18/09
• Voted on by House: 5/26/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 6/1/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the imposition of the franchise tax and local sales and use taxes, including the authority of a county or other local governmental entity to receive local sales tax information.

Impact

The changes proposed in SB636 are significant as they aim to empower local government entities by granting them better access to financial information pertaining to sales taxation. This will enhance the ability of counties to conduct economic forecasts and internal audits, potentially leading to more informed fiscal planning and resource allocation. The bill's provisions ensure that while counties gain access to important data, the confidentiality of individual tax payments is maintained, thereby protecting business privacy. It represents a step toward strengthening local taxation powers in Texas, potentially leading to more localized economic strategies.

Summary

Senate Bill 636 proposes amendments to the Texas Tax Code that enhance the authority of counties to access local sales tax information. The updated legislation mandates the comptroller to provide relevant tax data to counties that have established a local sales tax. Specifically, the bill stipulates that counties can request information related to sales tax payments made by businesses that remit over $25,000 in state and local sales taxes annually. This is expected to augment local governments' ability to monitor and forecast economic conditions more effectively. Moreover, the bill allows counties to receive aggregate data by areas designated for various economic activities, without disclosing individual businesses' tax payments.

Contention

While the bill mainly aims to streamline how counties receive tax data, it may also spark discussions around the implications of increased local power over taxation. Proponents argue that providing counties with access to these data will lead to improved economic oversight and better local governance. However, there could be concerns from various stakeholders, including businesses wary of government scrutiny and transparency issues. Additionally, the necessity of written requests each year by county judges for access to information could add administrative burdens, which may be contentious among different local government entities.