Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1481

Filed
 
Introduced
2/17/11  
Out of House Committee
3/14/11  
Voted on by House
3/30/11  
Refer
3/2/11  
Out of Senate Committee
5/13/11  
Report Pass
3/8/11  
Voted on by Senate
5/19/11  
Engrossed
3/30/11  
Governor Action
6/17/11  
Refer
4/13/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Report Pass
5/13/11  
Enrolled
5/23/11  
Enrolled
5/23/11  
Passed
6/17/11  

Caption

Relating to the use of person first respectful language in reference to individuals with disabilities.

Impact

The bill seeks to alter existing state law by introducing an explicit framework for language use concerning individuals with disabilities within legislative documents and broader governmental communication. This means that terms used by the Texas Legislative Council and various state agencies must prioritize respectful phrasing, which places individuals before their disabilities. Such reform is expected to influence public perception and foster an environment that acknowledges the dignity of individuals with disabilities.

Summary

House Bill 1481 focuses on the use of person first respectful language in reference to individuals with disabilities. The bill aims to foster a more inclusive societal attitude towards individuals with disabilities by mandating legislative and governmental use of preferred terminology. Through this initiative, terms that may be considered demeaning or offensive, such as 'disabled' and 'mentally retarded', are prohibited in new statutes and resolutions, with specified alternatives proposed to replace these outdated terms. The bill also involves amendments to existing laws to reflect this more respectful nomenclature.

Contention

While the intent of the bill is largely seen as positive in promoting respect and dignity, some stakeholders may express concerns regarding the practical implications of enforcing terminology changes across existing laws and multiple agencies. Critics may potentially raise issues regarding the cost and administrative burden of revising established statutes or include opinions on whether this initiative effectively addresses more pressing concerns facing individuals with disabilities. Overall, the bill's language reform is debated not only for its symbolic significance but also for its practical utility in improving the lives of persons with disabilities.

Companion Bills

TX SB26

Identical Relating to the use of person first respectful language in reference to individuals with disabilities.

Previously Filed As

TX SB1585

Relating to certain proceedings in juvenile court for children with mental illness and intellectual disabilities.

TX HB2037

Relating to certain proceedings in juvenile court for children with mental illness and intellectual disabilities.

TX HB1359

Relating to certain proceedings in juvenile court for children with mental illness and intellectual disabilities.

TX HB446

Relating to the terminology used in statute to refer to intellectual disability and certain references to abolished health and human services agencies.

TX SB332

Relating to the terminology used in statute to refer to intellectual disability and certain references to abolished health and human services agencies.

TX HB272

Relating to the terminology used to refer to certain disabilities and to an individualized education team for purposes of determining a student's eligibility for special education services and providing those services in public schools.

TX SB1539

Relating to the terminology used to refer to an individualized education program team.

TX HB5088

Relating to procedures regarding certain persons who are or may be persons with a mental illness or intellectual disability.

TX SB2479

Relating to procedures regarding certain persons who are or may be persons with a mental illness or intellectual disability.

TX SB1353

Relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with an intellectual disability.

Similar Bills

CA AB2512

Death penalty: person with an intellectual disability.

CA SB1001

Death penalty: intellectually disabled persons.

NJ S2664

Establishes Division of Intellectual and Development Disabilities in DCF.

NJ A1932

Establishes Division of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in DCF.

NJ S1243

Establishes Division of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in DCF.

HI SCR191

Urging The Establishment Of A Native Hawaiian Intellectual Property Working Group To Discuss Policies And Legislation With Respect To Native Hawaiian Intellectual Property.

RI H7791

Intellectual/developmental Disabilities Ombudsperson Act Of 2022

RI S2615

Intellectual/developmental Disabilities Ombudsperson Act Of 2022