Relating to the use of person first respectful language in reference to individuals with disabilities.
Impact
The passage of SB26 would require significant changes in how Texas statutes are articulated concerning individuals with disabilities. Agencies would be tasked with not only adopting this more respectful language but also with systematically reviewing existing laws to eliminate outdated terms. The implementation of the bill could lead to a broader cultural shift in how disabilities are perceived, promoting a more inclusive environment. Furthermore, it aims to embed these changes in various state agencies, impacting education, health, and human services, thereby encouraging respect and dignity for individuals with disabilities.
Summary
SB26, introduced by Senator Zaffirini, is a legislative initiative aimed at promoting the use of person-first respectful language in reference to individuals with disabilities. The bill mandates revisions in the legal language used within state statutes, resolutions, and references in government communications, shifting the terminology from terms deemed outdated or demeaning, such as 'mental retardation' and 'handicapped', to more appropriate phrases like 'persons with disabilities' and 'persons with intellectual disabilities'. This approach underscores the importance of language in shaping societal attitudes and norms towards individuals with disabilities.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB26 is generally positive among disability advocacy groups and progressive legislators, as it aligns with modern values of respect and dignity. Supporters argue that the bill fosters a culture of inclusion and recognizes the humanity of individuals with disabilities. However, there may be pockets of dissent, particularly from those who argue that legal terminologies matter less than the lived experiences of individuals and that language reforms should not be prioritized over substantive policy changes and support systems for individuals with disabilities.
Contention
Despite the positive reception, some critics may voice concerns regarding the practicality and effectiveness of the bill. They argue it could be seen as a superficial solution that does not address underlying issues affecting people with disabilities. Furthermore, discussions might emerge about the potential challenges and costs associated with updating existing laws and training personnel across various agencies to adapt to these linguistic changes effectively.
Relating to the terminology used in statute to refer to intellectual disability and certain references to abolished health and human services agencies.
Relating to the terminology used in statute to refer to intellectual disability and certain references to abolished health and human services agencies.
Relating to the terminology used to refer to certain disabilities and to an individualized education team for purposes of determining a student's eligibility for special education services and providing those services in public schools.
Urging The Establishment Of A Native Hawaiian Intellectual Property Working Group To Discuss Policies And Legislation With Respect To Native Hawaiian Intellectual Property.