Texas House Bill HB1529

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/18/11
• Introduced: 2/18/11
• Voted on by House: 4/27/11
• Refer: 3/2/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/12/11
• Report Pass: 4/14/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/19/11
• Engrossed: 4/27/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/28/11
• Report Pass: 5/12/11
• Enrolled: 5/21/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the offense of fraudulent use or possession of identifying information.

Impact

The implementation of HB1529 would enhance the legal tools available for addressing crimes related to identity theft. By including more forms of identifying data, law enforcement agencies can pursue fraud cases with a more comprehensive understanding of the various identifiers criminals may exploit. The bill emphasizes the state's commitment to protecting personal information and ensuring that offenders face serious consequences for identity-related crimes.

Summary

House Bill 1529 aims to amend the definition of 'identifying information' in the Texas Penal Code, specifically concerning the fraudulent use or possession of such information. The bill proposes to include additional forms of identifying information, such as unique biometric data (including fingerprints and iris images), in an expanded legal framework. This change responds to the increasing complexities of identity theft crimes, especially as technology and digital identities evolve. By broadening the definition, the bill intends to strengthen law enforcement's ability to prosecute these offenses effectively.

Contention

During the discussions surrounding HB1529, there were notable concerns regarding the potential implications for privacy rights. Opponents argued that the bill could lead to overreach, enabling more invasive data collection practices by authorities. Proponents, however, maintained that the measure was necessary to combat rising identity theft cases, asserting that it aligns with contemporary needs for security in a digital age. This tension between privacy and security reflects broader dialogues within legislative proceedings on how best to navigate law enforcement's authority while safeguarding citizens' personal rights.