Texas House Bill HB230

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 3/30/11
• Voted on by House: 5/15/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/21/11
• Report Pass: 3/29/11
• Engrossed: 5/15/11
• Refer: 5/16/11
• Report Pass: 5/21/11

Caption

Relating to the authority of a county or municipality to regulate the location of halfway houses; providing a penalty.

Impact

The introduction of HB 230 is expected to significantly influence local zoning laws and administrative procedures surrounding halfway houses. Local governments will have the power to restrict where these facilities can be placed, particularly in proximity to schools, religious establishments, and residential neighborhoods. By defining the parameters under which halfway houses may operate, the bill seeks to address community concerns about safety and residential integrity, while also ensuring that facilities serve the rehabilitative needs of residents.

Summary

House Bill 230 pertains to the authority granted to counties and municipalities in Texas regarding the regulation of halfway houses. The bill establishes a legal framework that allows local governing bodies to create regulations concerning the location and operation of these facilities. Notably, a halfway house is defined as a residential facility for individuals who are under community supervision or parole. The bill aims to enhance public health, safety, and welfare by allowing local authorities to assess and regulate where these facilities may be established within their jurisdictions.

Contention

While the bill is geared towards ensuring community welfare, it has sparked debate regarding the implications for individuals seeking rehabilitation. Proponents argue that local regulations are necessary to maintain public safety and order, allowing communities to have a say in the establishment of such facilities. Conversely, critics express concern that restricting locations may limit access to essential rehabilitation services for individuals on parole or community supervision, potentially hindering their reintegration into society. This tension highlights the delicate balance between community concerns and the need for supportive housing options for vulnerable populations.