Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2350

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the composition of the Texas Transportation Commission and the selection of members of that commission.

Impact

The change in membership structure could have significant implications for state transportation policies and initiatives. By facilitating direct election of commission members, the bill aims to foster greater public engagement and responsiveness in transportation decision-making. Supporters assert that this will help align transportation policies with the needs of Texas residents. However, the reduced size of the commission may limit diversity of perspectives and expertise within the body, which could affect decision-making processes and outcomes.

Summary

House Bill 2350 seeks to amend the Texas Transportation Code by altering the composition and operation of the Texas Transportation Commission. Key proposed changes include reducing the number of commission members from five to three, transitioning from a governor-appointed system to a system where members are elected statewide. This shift aims to increase accountability and ensure that commission members are directly representative of the public's interests in transportation issues. Additionally, the bill specifies eligibility criteria and grounds for removal from the commission, which are intended to enhance the integrity and functionality of the commission's operations.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment toward HB 2350 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the bill enhances democratic representation and accountability, as elected officials may be more attuned to constituent needs than appointed members. On the other side, critics express concerns about the potential for political influence over transportation decisions, fearing that elected commissioners might prioritize short-term political gains over long-term infrastructure planning and maintenance.

Contention

One major point of contention revolves around the method of selecting commission members. Critics of the elected approach argue that it may introduce political motivations and reduce the technical expertise necessary for effective transportation governance. Additionally, the reduction in commission size raises questions about the ability of the commission to adequately address the complex and diverse transportation needs across Texas. As such, these proposed changes will likely stimulate ongoing debate about the best approach to governance in the transportation domain.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2237

Transportation planning: regional transportation improvement plan: sustainable communities strategies: alternative planning strategy: state transportation funding.

CA SB1369

Energy: green electrolytic hydrogen.

CA SB1196

State Transit Assistance Program: eligibility: Anaheim Transportation Network.

HI HB699

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

HI SB770

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

CA AB1525

Transportation projects: priority populations.

UT SB0310

Transportation Utility Fee Amendments

HI HB1681

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.