Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2635

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
5/9/11  
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the composition of the First, Tenth, and Fourteenth Courts of Appeals Districts.

Impact

The changes proposed in HB 2635 are anticipated to have significant implications for the judicial system within Texas. By altering the district compositions, the bill is intended to ensure that cases are adjudicated by courts that are more representative of the populations they serve. This is particularly important in ensuring that districts do not become overburdened by cases, which can lead to delays in the legal process. Furthermore, it maintains that case jurisdiction remains intact even when cases are transferred to different appellate districts, contributing to the overall stability of the appellate system amidst these adjustments.

Summary

House Bill 2635 is designed to modify the composition of the First, Tenth, and Fourteenth Courts of Appeals in Texas. This bill specifically amends existing provisions in the Government Code, adjusting the counties that are included in these district courts. The revisions seek to better align judicial responsibilities with geographic and demographic realities, essentially redistributing the counties among these appellate courts to enhance operational efficiencies. By structuring the composition in a way that reflects current population distributions and case loads, the bill aims to facilitate more equitable access to justice across these regions.

Contention

While the bill's intent is generally seen as a move to improve judicial efficiency, there may be points of contention among various stakeholders. Some local representatives might express concerns about losing direct connections between their communities and their appellate courts, fearing that changes in district organization may dilute or disrupt community legal representation. Others might question whether the redistribution reflects true need, arguing that it may serve political rather than justice-centric criteria. Open discussions and debates surrounding these adjustments are expected as stakeholders assess the broader implications of these changes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.