Texas House Bill HB675

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 1/14/11
• Out of House Committee: 3/18/11
• Voted on by House: 4/6/11
• Refer: 2/21/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/20/11
• Report Pass: 3/15/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/23/11
• Engrossed: 4/6/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/20/11
• Report Pass: 5/20/11
• Enrolled: 5/24/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to football helmet safety requirements in public schools.

Impact

The introduction of this legislation is expected to have a significant impact on the safety of student athletes participating in football programs in Texas public schools. By implementing these mandatory requirements, school districts must now prioritize the procurement and maintenance of football helmets that adhere to up-to-date safety standards. This change could lead to increased costs for school districts as they may need to replace older helmets or invest in the reconditioning process. However, proponents argue that the safety of students outweighs these financial implications and that investing in equipment that prevents head injuries is a worthy expense.

Summary

House Bill 675 establishes new safety requirements for football helmets used in public school programs across Texas. The primary stipulation within the bill mandates that no school district can utilize football helmets that are 16 years old or older. This provision aims to enhance player safety by ensuring that outdated helmets, which may not meet modern safety standards, are removed from use. Additionally, helmets that are 10 years old or older must be reconditioned at least once every two years, encouraging regular maintenance and upkeep of safety gear utilized by student-athletes.

Contention

While the bill primarily focuses on safety, discussions surrounding its introduction have highlighted potential concerns from school districts regarding the financial burden of compliance. Some representatives express worry that smaller districts may struggle to meet the new requirements, particularly if they possess a substantial number of older helmets. Nonetheless, advocates for the bill emphasize that the long-term benefits of reducing head injury risks in young athletes will ultimately outweigh initial costs and logistical challenges. Overall, the bill reflects a growing recognition of the importance of student athlete safety in public education.