Texas Senate Bill SB1560

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/10/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 4/21/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/29/11
• Refer: 3/23/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/19/11
• Report Pass: 4/21/11
• Voted on by House: 5/25/11
• Engrossed: 4/29/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/2/11
• Report Pass: 5/18/11
• Enrolled: 5/25/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to liability of certain local emergency management or homeland security organizations.

Impact

The proposed law is significant as it clarifies the legal framework under which local emergency services operate, potentially reducing the risk of litigation against these organizations during disaster responses. By clearly defining liability issues, the bill could encourage local governments and volunteer organizations to participate in emergency management efforts without the fear of being held liable for actions taken during emergencies. Moreover, this could enhance public safety by fostering a more robust emergency response framework.

Summary

Senate Bill 1560 aims to amend the Civil Practice and Remedies Code in Texas concerning the liability of certain local emergency management or homeland security organizations. The bill defines 'emergency service organization' to include not only volunteer fire departments and emergency medical service providers but also local emergency management and homeland security organizations formed and operated pursuant to state guidelines. This change is intended to provide clarity in the legal standing of these organizations when responding to emergencies.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill may involve concerns about the balance of liability protections and accountability. While supporters argue that the bill is necessary to promote engagement of local entities in emergency management without the chilling effect of potential lawsuits, critics may contend that such protections could lead to a lack of accountability in the actions of emergency organizations. Additionally, discussions may emerge regarding whether the provisions sufficiently protect citizens' rights while enabling effective emergency responses.