Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1895

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
5/4/11  
Refer
4/7/11  
Voted on by Senate
5/9/11  
Report Pass
5/4/11  
Out of House Committee
5/13/11  
Engrossed
5/9/11  
Voted on by House
5/19/11  
Refer
5/9/11  
Governor Action
6/17/11  
Report Pass
5/12/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Introduced
5/13/11  

Caption

Relating to director elections and powers of the Texana Groundwater Conservation District.

Impact

Additionally, the bill explicitly prohibits the district from exercising the powers of eminent domain, as stipulated under Section 36.105 of the Water Code. This prohibition is significant as it means the district cannot involuntarily acquire private property for its functions, which is a common concern in instances where urban planning and water resource management intersect. This move is intended to protect landowners from potential government overreach and maintain a degree of trust between the district and the community it serves.

Summary

SB1895 aims to revise the election process and powers governing the board of directors for the Texana Groundwater Conservation District. One of the key facets of this bill is the amendment of the election date to align with the uniform election date in November, which is seen as a means to streamline governance and meet state requirements. By synchronizing these elections with statewide elections, the bill is expected to enhance voter participation and make the electoral process more efficient.

Conclusion

Ultimately, SB1895 serves to clarify and structure the leadership and operational parameters of the Texana Groundwater Conservation District, reflecting a growing trend in legislative actions aimed at improving local governance. By addressing both the election process and the powers vested in the district, the bill paves the way for a more transparent and accountable management of groundwater resources in Texas.

Contention

Despite the stated benefits of the bill, concerns have been raised regarding its implications on local governance and the operational efficacy of the district. Critics may argue that the restrictions on eminent domain could hinder the district's ability to effectively manage and oversee groundwater resources, especially as they pertain to cooperation with other governmental entities. This aspect of the bill could lead to debates about balancing local autonomy with the needs for broader resource management strategies.

Companion Bills

TX HB3805

Identical Relating to director elections and powers of the Texana Groundwater Conservation District.

Similar Bills

CA SB1476

Water replenishment districts: contracts.

CA SB793

Competitive bidding: design-build and best value construction contracting.

CA SB634

Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency.

CA AB2789

Design-build projects: local agencies.

CA AB2396

Public contracting: conflicts of interest: exemption.

TX SB2544

Relating to the creation of the West Texas Water Supply District; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting the power of eminent domain.

TX SB1056

Relating to the directors and administration of the Hidalgo County Water Improvement District No. 3.

TX SB755

Relating to the administration, powers, and duties of certain navigation districts.