Texas Senate Bill SB24

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/1/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 3/21/11
• Voted on by Senate: 3/23/11
• Refer: 3/7/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/6/11
• Report Pass: 3/21/11
• Voted on by House: 4/7/11
• Engrossed: 3/23/11
• Governor Action: 4/21/11
• Refer: 3/29/11
• Report Pass: 4/4/11
• Enrolled: 4/11/11
• Passed: 4/21/11

Caption

Relating to the prosecution, punishment, and certain criminal and civil consequences of offenses involving or related to the trafficking of persons and to certain protections for victims of those offenses.

Impact

The passage of SB24 is intended to strengthen existing laws surrounding human trafficking in Texas. By expanding definitions and introducing clearer guidelines for prosecution, the bill aims to create a more robust legal system capable of addressing the complexities of trafficking offenses. The bill would lead to longer statutes of limitations for certain serious offenses and impose stiffer penalties for repeat offenses, which in turn could potentially enhance deterrence efforts and facilitate justice for victims.

Summary

Senate Bill 24 addresses the prosecution and punishment of offenses related to human trafficking and certain protections for victims. It seeks to amend definitions in the Penal Code, enhance penalties for offenses involving the trafficking of persons, and introduce provisions for protective orders for victims of trafficking or sexual assault. The bill emphasizes the importance of combating human trafficking and ensuring adequate legal recourse for those affected by such crimes, establishing a framework for harsher penalties against offenders and better protections for victims.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB24 appears to be predominantly supportive, stemming from a collective recognition of the need to address the serious issue of human trafficking. Advocacy groups and legislators have voiced strong support for the bill, viewing it as a critical step toward protecting vulnerable populations. However, there may be some concerns regarding the implementation of the bill and its capacity to effectively improve outcomes for victims, as well as the potential impact on related legal procedures.

Contention

While SB24 generally enjoys bipartisan support, discussions may arise concerning the balance between harsh penalties and the rehabilitation of offenders. Some stakeholders may argue that overly punitive measures could disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Additionally, there may be concerns about the resource allocation required to enforce new protections and prosecute trafficking cases effectively. These points of contention highlight the ongoing dialogue about ensuring justice while also promoting fairness in the legal system.