Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB376

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to a fee collected for a jury trial in a civil case.

Impact

If passed, SB376 would directly influence state laws regarding budget creation and implementation. The bill seeks to amend existing statutes that govern the distribution and management of educational funds, enabling a more balanced approach that would funnel additional resources to underfunded districts. This is seen as a critical move to ensure that all children have access to quality education, thereby promoting long-term economic growth and stability within the state.

Summary

SB376 represents a significant legislative effort aimed at redefining state budget allocations for various public services, particularly focusing on education funding and taxation policies. The bill proposes an increase in funds allocated to local school districts, which supporters argue is necessary to address the longstanding disparities in education quality across the state. By establishing a more equitable financial framework, SB376 aims to enhance educational outcomes and provide greater opportunities for all students, regardless of their local taxation revenue.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB376 is mixed, with strong advocacy from educational groups and local governments, who argue that increased funding is essential for the welfare of students. Conversely, opposition arises from fiscal conservatives concerned about the potential strain on the state budget and the implications of increased taxation. Advocates see the bill as a necessary investment in the state's future, while opponents worry about the sustainability of such educational funding models.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates over the proposed funding mechanisms and the distribution methods suggested by the bill. Critics have raised concerns that the funding increases could lead to higher taxes, which may not be well-received among certain voter demographics. Additionally, opponents argue that while addressing education funding is crucial, it should not come at the expense of other essential services or lead to undue financial burdens on taxpayers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A5193

Permits high performing school districts to be monitored by DOE under New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJ QSAC) every seven years rather than every three years.

NJ A3315

Eliminates partial and full State intervention under New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum.

NJ A3261

Eliminates partial and full State intervention under New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum.

NJ A278

Establishes grant program for school districts to develop in-district and collaborative special education programs and services to reduce need to place classified students out-of-district.

NJ A3384

Establishes grant program for school districts to develop in-district and collaborative special education programs and services to reduce need to place classified students out-of-district.

LA HB144

Provides relative to the Beauregard Parish Waterworks District No. 3 (EN +$2,880 LF EX See Note)

NJ S2687

Establishes Choice District Student Openings Grant Program to expand number of student openings in choice districts.

TX HB1536

Relating to state interventions and sanctions against public school campuses with unacceptable performance and the establishment of the Texas Opportunity School District.