Texas Senate Bill SB592

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/10/11

Caption

Relating to the powers and duties of the state auditor's office.

Impact

The proposed changes are intended to enhance financial accountability and transparency within state agencies. By extending the auditor's authority to issue subpoenas for documents and requiring specific entities to cooperate in audits, the bill will enforce compliance among agencies that handle state funds. Furthermore, the establishment of an Audit and Investigative Coordinating Council is expected to streamline auditing practices and foster collaboration among internal auditors and inspectors general, thus promoting efficiency and thoroughness in state oversight.

Summary

SB592 aims to amend various provisions in the Government Code related to the powers and duties of the State Auditor's Office in Texas. The bill seeks to expand the authority of the State Auditor by allowing for more comprehensive access to documentation and audit records of various state entities, improving the oversight capabilities of the office. Specifically, it introduces provisions for the audit and investigation of public entities, ensuring that the state auditor has the necessary leverage to access information that may be critical for audits, including working papers and communications associated with investigations.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB592 appears to be supportive among legislators who prioritize government efficiency and fiscal responsibility. Advocates argue that empowering the State Auditor enhances public trust in governmental operations and improves financial management integrity. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders regarding the potential implications for privacy and the resources required for compliance with these expanded auditing powers, which could lead to increased administrative burdens on state agencies.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions on the balance between enhanced auditing power and the operational burden placed on state agencies. Opponents express caution about overly broad powers of the State Auditor that may inadvertently lead to excessive scrutiny of agency operations. The debate centers on finding a compromise that maintains effective oversight without compromising the operational efficiency of state departments or infringing on their autonomy.