Texas Senate Bill SB894

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/23/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 3/29/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/7/11
• Refer: 3/1/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/29/11
• Report Pass: 3/29/11
• Voted on by House: 5/4/11
• Engrossed: 4/7/11
• Governor Action: 5/12/11
• Refer: 4/11/11
• Report Pass: 4/28/11
• Enrolled: 5/5/11
• Passed: 5/12/11

Caption

Relating to employment of physicians by certain hospitals.

Impact

The bill amends Chapter 311 of the Health and Safety Code by establishing clear guidelines that allow hospitals to employ physicians while ensuring that these physicians maintain their independent medical judgment. This is critical for ensuring that patient care remains uncompromised and that hospitals can attract and retain qualified medical professionals. The provisions require hospitals to appoint a chief medical officer and develop operational policies to regulate this employment, thereby introducing accountability and standards within these healthcare institutions.

Summary

SB894 relates to the employment of physicians by certain hospitals, particularly focusing on regulations that apply to critical access hospitals and sole community hospitals. The bill allows these healthcare facilities to employ physicians and retain a portion of the income generated by them. This legislative measure is aimed at supporting the financial sustainability of smaller hospitals, which often face economic challenges in rural and less populated counties in Texas. By stipulating specific conditions under which physicians can be hired, the bill seeks to formalize the relationship between hospitals and their employed physicians while also safeguarding the integrity of medical practice.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB894 is the balance between hospital oversight and the independent practice of medicine. Some critics argue that, while the bill provides necessary support to struggling hospitals, it could lead to conflicts where the governing body might exert undue influence over clinical decisions. The assurance that physicians can operate with independent judgment is crucial, and the measures outlined in the bill intend to mitigate concerns regarding any potential for interference. Thus, while the bill has the potential to bolster healthcare access in underserved areas, it also engages stakeholders in a discourse about the preservation of clinical autonomy.