Texas Senate Bill SB1026

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

• Filed: 3/4/13
• Out of Senate Committee: 3/26/13
• Voted on by Senate: 4/4/13
• Out of House Committee: 4/22/13
• Voted on by House: 5/2/13
• Governor Action: 5/18/13

Caption

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of certain local laws concerning special districts, including conforming amendments.

Impact

As a result of SB1026, local laws concerning special districts will be revised to better reflect current practices and legal frameworks. This includes enhancements related to voting requirements for bond issuance, taxation policies, and the financial management of special districts. The bill facilitates the operation of these districts, allowing them to effectively manage funds for public services. Furthermore, the updated laws may strengthen the operational capabilities of districts involved in providing essential services, such as healthcare and flood control.

Summary

SB1026 pertains to the nonsubstantive revision of certain local laws regarding special districts in Texas. The bill aims to update, clarify, and consolidate existing statutes while making necessary conforming amendments. It addresses various aspects of special districts, including the powers and responsibilities of governing boards, the issuance of bonds, taxation regulations, and the management of district affairs. By overhauling these local laws, SB1026 seeks to streamline governance processes and enhance transparency.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding SB1026 has been largely supportive, particularly among legislative members who advocate for improved efficiency within local governance. However, some concerns have arisen regarding the potential for increased taxation and financial burdens on constituents. Many lawmakers recognize the bill's intent to modernize and clarify the existing framework, but they also emphasize the need for careful consideration of how these changes affect local communities and taxpayers. Overall, the discussion reflects a balance between supporting local governance and addressing constituent concerns.

Contention

Notable points of contention highlighted in discussions around SB1026 include the implications of bond issuance and the accompanying tax rates that could be imposed by special districts. Critics argue that while increased efficiency is beneficial, it is crucial to ensure that the resulting tax burdens do not disproportionately affect low-income residents. Additionally, some lawmakers have raised questions about the governance structures of these special districts to ensure they remain accountable and transparent in their operations.