Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB150

Filed
11/10/14  
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to daylight saving time.

Impact

If enacted, HB 150 would establish a new standard for timekeeping in Texas, allowing for a consistent clock setting year-round. This change would impact daily operations for businesses, schools, and other institutions that currently adjust their schedules to accommodate daylight saving time. Proponents argue that removing the biannual clock change could enhance productivity, improve public health, and reduce confusion during the transition periods.

Summary

House Bill 150 aims to amend the Texas Government Code to exempt the state from the provisions of the Uniform Time Act of 1966, specifically those pertaining to daylight saving time. This would mean that Texas would have the option to eliminate or not adhere to the changing of clocks twice a year, effectively allowing the state to remain on standard time throughout the year. The intention behind this bill reflects the growing sentiment among some lawmakers and constituents that the practice of adjusting clocks is unnecessary and disruptive.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 150 is mixed. Supporters laud the potential convenience and consistency it could provide, particularly for industries and residents who find the clock changes cumbersome and confusing. However, there are concerns from opponents about the implications of aligning solely with standard time, particularly regarding activities that are traditionally synchronized with daylight saving, such as agriculture and tourism. Critics argue that it could disrupt established routines and schedules across various sectors.

Contention

Debate around HB 150 includes significant discussion regarding regional impacts and divisions among constituents. Some lawmakers and public advocacy groups believe that adhering to standard time could put Texas at a disadvantage compared to neighboring states that observe daylight saving time, affecting travel, commerce, and communication. The conversation often highlights a tension between modernization and tradition, as well as differing opinions on the benefits of retaining or abolishing daylight saving time practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.