Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2278

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 

Caption

Relating to authorizing certain current and retired associate judges to conduct a marriage ceremony.

Impact

The impact of HB 2278 is primarily focused on making the legal process of marriage more accessible to individuals seeking to marry. By allowing associate judges to perform marriage ceremonies, the bill aims to reduce potential wait times and logistical challenges faced by couples trying to find authorized officiants. This change could help meet the demands of a growing population and provides an additional avenue for couples who wish to have a civil ceremony without involving a traditional religious context.

Summary

House Bill 2278 was introduced to authorize certain current and retired associate judges to conduct marriage ceremonies in Texas. This bill amends Section 2.202(a) of the Family Code by expanding the list of persons who are legally permitted to officiate at weddings. By including specific types of judges and their retirees, it aims to increase the accessibility of marriage ceremonies, allowing a broader range of officiants beyond traditional religious leaders and court justices.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2278 appeared to be largely positive, reflected in the unanimous vote of 139 to 0 during its readings. Supporters viewed this bill as a practical solution to streamline the marriage ceremony process, suggesting that it recognizes the evolving needs of the state's residents. The broad support indicates a consensus on the importance of accessibility in marriage officiation.

Contention

While there were no recorded significant points of contention during the legislative discussions, the inclusion of associate judges into the list of authorized marriage officiants may still raise questions about the qualifications and experiences of such judges compared to traditional officiants. Nevertheless, the lack of opposition suggests that lawmakers saw the bill as a necessary update to the state's legal framework regarding marriage, aligning it with contemporary societal needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.