Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3740

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the creation of DNA records for a person arrested for a Class A misdemeanor or felony offense.

Impact

If enacted, HB3740 would amend existing sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Government Code, focusing on the responsibilities of judges, law enforcement, and defendants regarding DNA reporting. Specifically, the bill requires that during the community supervision process, judges must obtain DNA samples from convicted felons unless the defendants have already submitted such samples under other state laws. Additionally, it adheres to the framework that connects court costs with DNA testing, establishing statutory fees for the collection and testing of DNA for individuals convicted of certain offenses.

Summary

House Bill 3740, known as the Krystal Gene Baker Act, is a legislative proposal aimed at modifying the existing laws related to the collection and maintenance of DNA records for individuals arrested for Class A misdemeanors and felonies in Texas. The bill stipulates that a DNA sample must be provided by anyone arrested for these offenses, creating a DNA record for law enforcement use. This requirement is intended to enhance the state's ability to solve crimes and analyze patterns of criminal behavior by having a more comprehensive database of DNA samples.

Conclusion

As the bill seeks to enhance public safety through improved criminal identification measures, it highlights the tension between law enforcement objectives and individual liberties. Should HB3740 pass, it could pave the way for increased scrutiny over existing state practices concerning DNA evidence, and potentially set a precedent for other states considering similar legislation.

Contention

The implications of HB3740 may lead to discussions around civil rights and privacy concerns associated with mandatory DNA collection. Critics of the bill may argue that such requirements could infringe on individual rights, especially regarding the presumption of innocence before conviction. Furthermore, the legislation necessitates the ongoing management of sensitive genetic data, which raises questions about the effectiveness of measures to protect this information from misuse or unauthorized access.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2236

Optometry: certification to perform advanced procedures.

CA AB1196

Sacramento Regional Transit District: board of directors: voting procedures.

TX SB1420

Relating to court costs and fees in criminal proceedings.

CA SB923

Criminal investigations: eyewitness identification.

TX HB3992

Relating to court costs imposed on conviction and deposited to the courthouse security fund or the municipal court building security fund; increasing fees.

TX HB726

Relating to prohibited nonconsensual medical procedures and treatment on certain minors with intersex traits.

TX HB1746

Relating to prohibited nonconsensual medical procedures and treatment on certain minors with intersex traits.

TX HB1559

Relating to prohibited nonconsensual medical procedures and treatment on certain minors with intersex traits.