Texas Senate Bill SB1389

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to the border commerce coordinator.

Impact

If enacted, SB1389 would amend the Government Code of Texas to enhance the management of trade-related activities along the Texas-Mexico border. The coordinated efforts would include resolving transportation issues, increasing funding for crucial infrastructure such as wastewater facilities, and promoting low-sulfur fuel sales to improve the environmental impact of cross-border transport. Overall, the bill is expected to bolster economic growth while fostering stronger Texas-Mexico relations.

Summary

SB1389 is a legislative proposal focused on enhancing trade and commerce between Texas and its neighboring states in Mexico and Canada. The bill mandates the appointment of a border commerce coordinator, responsible for overseeing and facilitating trade issues, infrastructure enhancement, and cooperative regulation between federal, state, and local governments. By implementing this role, the bill aims to streamline processes and address challenges that currently impede cross-border trade and transportation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1389 appears to be largely positive, with support from various stakeholders who see the potential for improved trade facilities and economic benefits. Proponents argue that the coordinator’s role will lead to better communication among the involved governments and streamline processes, ultimately benefiting local economies. However, there may be underlying concerns about the adequacy of oversight and how the new coordinator's initiatives will be implemented in practice.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support for its focus on improving trade and transport, there are concerns regarding the scope of the coordinator's powers and the potential implications for existing regulations and local governance. Critics may point to the challenges of coordinating across different government levels and the risk of prioritizing trade efficiency over local community interests. The balance between facilitating commerce and maintaining local autonomy will likely be a point of contention as the bill progresses.