Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1970

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to increasing the electronic filing fee for certain courts.

Impact

The passage of SB1970 is projected to elevate revenue collected from electronic filing fees, which could enhance the budget allocations for court operations and potentially improve the efficiency of judicial processes. While the bill aims to support the judicial system, its financial implications may place an additional burden on litigants who must pay the increased fees, particularly for those who are already facing financial hardships in accessing the court system.

Summary

SB1970 proposes an amendment to the Government Code of Texas regarding the electronic filing fees for certain courts. Specifically, the bill increases the fee for filing any civil action or related proceedings in the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, District Courts, and various other courts from $20 to $30. This increase applies to any subsequent civil actions or filings requiring a fee, reflecting an ongoing effort to bolster the operational funding of the court system via electronic transactions.

Sentiment

The sentiment associated with SB1970 is mixed. Proponents argue that the increase is justified considering the rising operational costs associated with maintaining court services and improving electronic filing systems. However, critics contend that raising fees may deter individuals from seeking legal recourse due to heightened financial barriers, emphasizing the need for accessible justice rather than increased costs.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB1970 focus on the implications of increased fees for access to justice. Stakeholders express concern that a higher electronic filing fee may disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and small businesses that rely on the court system for legal recourse. The debate emphasizes a critical intersection of financial policy and access to justice, with advocates for the marginalized calling for alternatives to funding the judicial system without imposing higher costs on users.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.