Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB404

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to requiring state agencies to identify spending reduction measures.

Impact

The implementation of SB404 could significantly alter state budgeting practices. By formalizing a process for identifying cost reductions, the bill may lead to more prudent financial planning. The Legislative Budget Board is given the authority to set standards for the reporting process, which could influence how agencies prioritize expenditures. In effect, this could promote a culture of accountability amongst state agencies, as they would be required to reflect on and report their spending habits regularly.

Summary

SB404 relates to the requirement for state agencies to identify measures aimed at reducing their spending. This bill mandates that each state agency must submit a detailed report biennially, specifying strategies for cutting their expenses by 1%, 5%, and 10%. The proposal intends to promote fiscal responsibility and ensure that agencies are equipped with actionable plans for budget cuts, potentially improving overall government efficiency. This aligns with broader goals to maintain budgets in the face of potential economic fluctuations and ensure better allocation of state resources.

Contention

While proponents assert that SB404 is a necessary measure for improving financial practices within state agencies, there may be contention regarding the implementation of actual budget cuts. Critics might argue that mandated reductions could inadvertently harm essential services if agencies are forced to cut too deeply without discretion. Additionally, some stakeholders may view the requirements as an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy that could lead to significant administrative burdens without adequate resources.

Considerations

As SB404 moves through the legislative process, discussions will likely revolve around balancing the benefits of mandated reporting with the potential risks to service delivery and operational effectiveness. Key considerations will include how the cuts are determined, the impact on personnel and operations, and the necessity for oversight on the suggested reductions to ensure that essential services are not compromised.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.