Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB812

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 

Caption

Relating to the appointment of an associate judge in a family law proceeding involving a name change.

Impact

The introduction of SB812 would directly affect the legal framework governing family law proceedings in Texas by codifying the conditions under which associate judges can be appointed and the extent of their authority. By clarifying the roles and responsibilities of associate judges, the bill is intended to streamline the judicial process for name changes, thus removing potential bottlenecks that can occur when court resources are limited. It is designed to maintain judicial effectiveness while ensuring that the proceedings are managed efficiently, benefiting those seeking legal name changes.

Summary

SB812 seeks to amend the Family Code of Texas concerning the appointment of associate judges specifically in family law cases that involve name changes. This legislation allows for the appointment of either full-time or part-time associate judges, contingent upon the authorization from the county commissioners court. The bill aims to facilitate judicial efficiency by enabling judges to delegate certain responsibilities to associate judges during family law proceedings, which could lead to timelier resolution of these cases.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB812 appears to be generally positive among legislative members, as indicated by a unanimous voting outcome of 139-0 in favor of the bill during its third reading in the House. Supporters see the legislation as a necessary step to improve the functioning of family courts, particularly in managing cases that may otherwise languish due to insufficient judicial resources. However, some concerns may have been raised regarding the implications of having associate judges and ensuring they uphold the standards expected in family law cases, although these did not translate into significant opposition during voting.

Contention

While there appears to be broad support for SB812, notable points of contention could arise regarding the interpretation of the powers accorded to associate judges. Critics could argue that the bill might lead to inconsistencies in rulings and procedural standards if not properly regulated, potentially impacting the quality of justice provided in family law cases. Ensuring proper training and guidelines for associate judges would be crucial to addressing these concerns and maintaining public confidence in the family legal system.

Companion Bills

TX HB2411

Identical Relating to the appointment of an associate judge in a family law proceeding involving a name change.

Previously Filed As

TX HB4638

Relating to the appointment and duties of an associate judge in the 229th Judicial District.

TX HB4128

Relating to associate judges for guardianship proceedings and protective services proceedings in certain courts.

TX SB21

Relating to associate judges for guardianship proceedings and protective services proceedings in certain courts.

TX SB15

Relating to associate judges for guardianship proceedings and protective services proceedings in certain courts.

TX SB1726

Relating to associate judges for guardianship proceedings and protective services proceedings in certain courts.

TX HB2272

Relating to associate judges and Department of Family and Protective Services representation in child protection court proceedings.

TX SB1173

Relating to the appointment of criminal law hearing officers and of a special presiding judge and associate judges for certain courts.

TX SB1462

Relating to the operation and administration of and practices and procedures related to proceedings in the judicial branch of state government.

TX HB3474

Relating to the operation and administration of and practices and procedures regarding proceedings in the judicial branch of state government, including the service of process and delivery of documents related to the proceedings, the administration of oaths, and the management of the Texas Indigent Defense Commission, and the composition of certain juvenile boards; establishing a civil penalty; increasing certain court costs; authorizing fees.

TX HB4699

Relating to the appointment of an attorney pro tem for certain criminal proceedings.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.