Urging Congress to propose and submit to the states for ratification a regulation freedom amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
If enacted, this amendment would significantly alter how federal regulations are implemented by increasing the legislative barriers needed for adoption. States would gain a new avenue to contest federal regulations beyond the current reliance on the judicial system, as they would be able to express collective opposition through their congressional delegation to put regulations on hold until a vote is secured. This could lead to a reduction in regulatory authority wielded by federal agencies, thereby enhancing state sovereignty and local governance.
SCR23 urges Congress to propose a regulation freedom amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This proposed amendment aims to restore a balance of power by requiring a majority vote from both the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate to adopt significant federal regulations. This move is rooted in the belief that current federal regulatory overreach undermines constitutional liberties guaranteed by the First, Second, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments. The resolution highlights the weaknesses of existing legislation, facing challenges from future administrations, which renders the advocacy for an amendment necessary.
The proposal is likely to attract both support and opposition. Proponents argue that it would empower states and reduce the federal government's ability to impose regulations without adequate representation or oversight. They contend that state legislatures should have a more significant role in shaping regulatory policies that affect their constituents. However, critics may argue that this amendment could lead to legal battles over jurisdiction and create uncertainty in federal regulatory processes, potentially hampering effective governance and the implementation of necessary regulations designed for public welfare.