Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas House Bill HB113

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the authority of the governing body of a local authority to impose a civil penalty for certain violations recorded by an automated traffic control system or a photographic traffic signal enforcement system; providing a civil penalty.

Impact

The enactment of HB 113 will reshape how local governments manage traffic enforcement using technology. The bill allows civil penalties ranging from $1,000 for first-time violations to as much as $10,500 for subsequent violations. Consequently, local authorities will need to assess not only their existing traffic systems but also ensure they are compliant with the stipulated regulations of this law. Furthermore, the bill ensures that citizens can file complaints against local authorities that violate these guidelines, introducing a mechanism for accountability and transparency in traffic enforcement practices, emphasizing the need for adherence to the law.

Summary

House Bill 113 pertains to the authority of local governing bodies to impose civil penalties for violations captured by automated traffic control systems and photographic traffic signal enforcement systems. The legislation seeks to establish a framework for how local authorities can operate these systems, specifically quantifying penalties for non-compliance with established guidelines. One significant aspect of the bill is the amendment to the Transportation Code, which includes a prohibition against local municipalities implementing or operating automated traffic control systems intended for speed enforcement, alongside clarifying conditions under which civil penalties can be enforced against these local authorities.

Contention

Notably, there may be contention surrounding the interpretation of 'automated traffic control systems' and how strictly local authorities need to comply with the limitations imposed by HB 113. Critics of the bill might argue that such restrictions could undermine local governments' ability to regulate traffic effectively within their jurisdictions. Moreover, there is potential concern regarding the fiscal implications for local authorities relying on these systems for generating revenue through fines, as they must now navigate increased regulatory oversight and potential penalties for non-compliance. The balance between maintaining public safety through effective enforcement and allowing local autonomy could spark debates during the bill's implementation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

IL SB3671

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

IL SB2087

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

CA SB605

State attorneys and administrative law judges: compensation.

CA AB1163

Minors: power of attorney to care for a minor child.

CA SB1109

Adoption.

CA SB710

District attorneys: conflicts of interest.

CA AB2083

Public utilities: rates.

CA AB894

Attorney General: directors and employees: exemption from civil service.