Expressing opposition to using eminent domain for the construction of a wall or fence along the U.S.-Mexico border.
The resolution calls attention to the ecological and economic consequences that would arise from erecting a border wall or fence. It warns that such construction would not only bisect private properties but also detract from the natural beauty of significant Texas landmarks, such as Big Bend National Park and the Rio Grande, which are vital for tourism. The resolution advocates for alternative, less intrusive methods for federal law enforcement, involving technology and collaboration with state and local law enforcement, rather than constructing physical barriers.
SCR31 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution expressing opposition to the use of eminent domain by the federal government for the construction of a wall or fence along the U.S.-Mexico border. The resolution highlights the significant presence of privately owned land—comprising 67 percent of the U.S.-Mexico border in Texas—and emphasizes the potential infringement on the rights of private landowners that could arise from implementing such a federal project. It argues that prior construction of border fencing has already resulted in undue disruption of private property without landowners' consent.
Notable points of contention surrounding SCR31 include the broader debate over federal power versus states' rights, particularly in the context of property rights. Supporters of the resolution argue that the proposed wall constitutes a significant federal land grab that could undermine local economies and violate individual property rights. Conversely, proponents of border construction may argue that a physical barrier is necessary for national security. The resolution aims to influence federal policy by conveying the sentiments of Texas legislators to national representatives.