Texas 2017 - 85th 1st C.S.

Texas House Bill HB26

Caption

Relating to the regulation of groundwater.

Impact

The legislative changes proposed in HB 26 are expected to significantly impact local water management policies. By requiring that the rules in effect at the time of a permit application submission are the only ones considered, the bill minimizes the potential for new regulations to impede the existing permit applications. This means that districts may have limited authority to impose additional restrictions beyond those already established, which can foster an environment more favorable to potential groundwater exporters while also raising concerns among water conservation advocates. Moreover, the bill aims at expediting the processing of applications by ensuring that all sets of requirements are clearly delineated and adhered to, thus making the operational landscape predictable for entities involved in groundwater extraction and utilization.

Summary

House Bill 26 relates to the comprehensive regulation of groundwater within Texas, specifically amending various sections of the Water Code to clarify the criteria and procedural aspects governing the issuance of permits. This bill seeks to establish a balance between allowing groundwater export and ensuring sustainable management of water resources, by imposing certain limitations on the applicability of rules when permit applications are submitted. The intent is to promote consistency in the management protocols across districts, thereby streamlining the decision-making process for groundwater-related permits.

Contention

While HB 26 presents a codified framework for managing groundwater permits, it has sparked a notable debate among stakeholders regarding the prudent balance between economic interests and sustainable water management. Proponents of the bill argue that it will facilitate growth and development by easing the acquisition of permits required for exporting groundwater. However, critics express concerns that this focus on permitting efficiency may overlook essential environmental considerations and the long-term sustainability of water resources in Texas. The introduction of moratorium procedures, requiring public hearings and written findings for districts to impose moratoriums on permit issuance, is another contentious aspect, as it places additional checks on local decision-making but may complicate urgent conservation efforts in response to drought or over-extraction scenarios.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

TX HB2377

Relating to the development of brackish groundwater.

TX HB27

Relating to the development of brackish groundwater.

TX HB722

Relating to the development of brackish groundwater.

TX HB4258

Relating to the regulation by groundwater conservation districts of the drilling of and the production of groundwater by certain water wells.

TX HB4138

Relating to the expiration date of certain permits issued by groundwater conservation districts.

TX SB2832

Relating to the expiration date of certain permits issued by groundwater conservation districts.

TX SB152

Relating to the regulation of groundwater conservation districts.

TX SB517

Relating to notice of an application for a permit to drill an injection well in the territory of a groundwater conservation district.

Similar Bills

TX HB726

Relating to the regulation of groundwater.

TX HB31

Relating to the regulation of groundwater.

TX HB4164

Relating to the procedures for adopting a moratorium on the issuance of permits by groundwater conservation districts.

AZ SB1667

Water; rural management areas

AZ SB1551

Rural management areas

NV AJR13

Urges the Federal Government to maintain the moratorium on the testing of explosive nuclear weapons. (BDR R-1102)

OK SB133

Groundwater permits; requiring certain license be presented for intended use of groundwater for medical marijuana grow facilities. Effective date. Emergency.

AZ HB2570

Temporary non-expansion area