Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2243

Caption

Relating to the use of prescription asthma medicine on public and private school campuses.

Impact

If enacted, the legislation would change the Education Code to require schools to have clear protocols regarding the storage, administration, and training for using asthma medication. It stipulates that the school nurse can administer asthma medicine only with prior written consent from a parent or guardian, which safeguards the student's health while allowing the school staff to act promptly in emergencies. The bill also mandates schools to have appropriate policies for inventory management and accessibility of asthma medicine on campus, thus improving overall student support services related to health emergencies.

Summary

House Bill 2243 pertains to the administration and maintenance of prescription asthma medicine on public and private school campuses in Texas. The bill allows school districts, charter schools, and private schools to adopt policies permitting school nurses to maintain and administer asthma medication to students diagnosed with asthma. This legislative measure emphasizes the importance of having readily available medical resources for students who may experience asthma-related issues during school hours, ensuring higher safety and health standards in educational environments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2243 has largely been positive, as it is aimed at protecting students' health and safety. By addressing asthma management directly within school systems, the bill is viewed favorably by health advocates and educational leaders who believe it enhances emergency preparedness. The notion of empowering school nurses to manage asthma care aligns with broader health initiatives aimed at minimizing health risks for children in educational settings. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation of such programs and the necessity for adequate training and resources.

Contention

While the bill enjoys broad support among legislators and educators, some opposition may arise around the costs and logistics associated with implementing these health policies in schools. Concerns could include funding the purchase of asthma medications and ensuring training for school staff without creating additional financial burdens on school districts. Additionally, there may be discussions regarding the scope of liability for school employees administering medication, which could lead to debates on policy amendments to clarify responsibilities.

Companion Bills

TX SB1665

Same As Relating to the use of prescription asthma medicine on public and private school campuses.

Similar Bills

CA AB1651

Pupil health: emergency medical care: epinephrine auto-injectors.

TX HB2283

Relating to the use of an epinephrine delivery device by certain entities.

TX SB1619

Relating to the use of an epinephrine delivery system by certain entities.

CA SB568

Pupil health: epinephrine delivery systems: public schools and programs.

TX HB2847

Relating to policies and training regarding the use of epinephrine auto-injectors by school districts and open-enrollment charter schools; providing immunity.

TX SB66

Relating to the use of epinephrine auto-injectors on public school and open-enrollment charter school campuses and at or in transit to or from off-campus school events.

CA AB228

Pupil health: epinephrine delivery systems.

TX SB1374

Relating to the administration of epinephrine medication by public and private schools.