Texas Senate Bill SB385

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to a common characteristic or use project in a public improvement district in certain municipalities.

Impact

The proposed changes under SB 385 could significantly impact local laws governing municipal infrastructure, particularly in areas where hotel industries are prevalent. By distinguishing between different classes of municipalities based on population and geographic criteria (e.g., proximity to Lake Lewisville), the bill facilitates targeted investment in specific regions. This measure is intended to optimize local spending on infrastructure improvements, beneficially impacting tourism and the hospitality sector, and potentially enhancing the municipalities' competitive stand in attracting businesses.

Summary

Senate Bill 385 aims to amend the Local Government Code, specifically focusing on public improvement districts in certain municipalities in Texas. The bill primarily targets municipalities with populations above specific thresholds (approximately between 115,000 to 2 million residents) and stipulates conditions under which these municipalities can undertake projects related to common characteristics or use within their districts. Notably, the bill alters the criteria for hotel development projects, allowing for greater flexibility in establishing public improvement districts tailored to bolster local economic growth.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 385 appears to be largely positive among proponents, as reflected in the legislative voting history, where the bill passed with strong support in both the Senate (30-1) and the House (115-25). Advocates argue that the bill is a pragmatic solution that enables municipalities to better utilize their resources for essential infrastructure projects that meet local development needs. However, there may be underlying concerns about state-level oversight and control, suggesting that discussions could exist around the balance of power between state legislation and local governance.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 385 stem from the implications of its criteria for public improvement districts and the potential for inequitable benefits across different municipalities. Critics may argue that the specificity of population and geographical regions in the bill could marginalize smaller towns or those not meeting the set thresholds, thereby limiting equal opportunities for economic development. Additionally, there may be debates regarding the degree of local autonomy in undertaking infrastructure projects, as the alterations to the Local Government Code shift some powers and responsibilities back to the state level.