Relating to the use of dyed diesel fuel to operate a motor vehicle during and for a limited period following certain disasters.
The law modifies Section 162.235 of the Tax Code by introducing new provisions that allow for the operation of motor vehicles on public highways using dyed diesel fuel under certain emergency conditions. This change affects fuel usage laws by expanding accessibility during critical times when typical fuel supplies may be disrupted. The intent is to ensure that affected vehicle owners can mobilize quickly and efficiently to respond to emergencies, thus enhancing both personal safety and community readiness.
House Bill 4296 focuses on permitting the use of dyed diesel fuel in motor vehicles during specified disaster conditions. The bill aims to provide flexibility to fuel usage in times of emergency, such as during floods, hurricanes, or other natural disasters. Under this legislation, individuals can legally operate their vehicles with dyed diesel fuel in designated disaster areas as long as they provide a signed statement to licensed suppliers or distributors, along with an end user number issued by the comptroller.
The sentiment around HB 4296 appears to be generally supportive among legislators, as evidenced by its unanimous passage in the voting history, with 146 yeas and no nays recorded. This strong support likely reflects a shared understanding of the necessity and importance of having flexible fuel regulations in place during disasters. The bill’s focus on emergency preparedness resonates positively with both lawmakers and the public, indicating a proactive approach to disaster management.
Notably, the bill does not seem to have generated substantial controversy or public dissent. The primary consideration might center around ensuring that the dyed diesel fuel does not substitute for regular, taxed diesel fuel outside of emergency situations, maintaining proper fuel tax regulations and accountability. However, as the law emphasizes accessibility and readiness during crises, there are few points of contention reported in the legislative history, suggesting a unified legislative front in support of enhancing disaster response capabilities.